6 Comments
User's avatar
Sandra Dingler's avatar

Thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment
Christina Phillips's avatar

Linked in from the article in “Sensible Medicine.” Thank you for this other angle which makes a lot of sense. As a 48yo woman who is fairly healthy I have not yet had a mammogram but do annual thermography readings which I understand to be a harmlessly type of exposure.

Expand full comment
Zade's avatar

Once I found out that the radiation from mammography poses a significant cumulative risk I decided never again and I'm sorry I ever had a mammogram.

Expand full comment
Sunshine's avatar

Same here. Succumbed to the pressure and had three

Mammograms over many years but no more. Did not make sense to shoot radiation through breasts every year!

Expand full comment
Deb Klein's avatar

They're fairly good at monitoring existing cancers, but not at all for screening. Even naturopaths don't recommend thermo screening.

Expand full comment
Deb Klein's avatar

They're fairly good at monitoring existing cancers, but not at all for screening. Even naturopaths don't re ommend thermo screening.

Expand full comment