Thank you, I was not aware of this work. I am sorry that you were persecuted for your work. I know France now does less mammography than we do in UK which suggests someone listened. I also read recently about the dangers of ultrasound scanning which I was unaware of. Let us hope that we can maintain uncensored sharing of real science so more become aware of risks.
-. You wrote: “ These studies find a number of cancers more than 100 times greater than the prediction of the LNT model”. I am assuming that this must be for a particular limited scenario, such a low levels of exposure, because if total cancers were 100 times prediction the model would be thrown away. Can you say a little more about this?
- Is it possible that the benefit of early discovery & treatment that medical scans provide still results in overall better population longevity even if the scans cause a small number of cancers?
Thank you, I was not aware of this work. I am sorry that you were persecuted for your work. I know France now does less mammography than we do in UK which suggests someone listened. I also read recently about the dangers of ultrasound scanning which I was unaware of. Let us hope that we can maintain uncensored sharing of real science so more become aware of risks.
Merci pour votre travail et votre persévérance, et surtout courage !
Votre honnêteté vaincra leur lâcheté !
nerve-racking...
Two questions
-. You wrote: “ These studies find a number of cancers more than 100 times greater than the prediction of the LNT model”. I am assuming that this must be for a particular limited scenario, such a low levels of exposure, because if total cancers were 100 times prediction the model would be thrown away. Can you say a little more about this?
- Is it possible that the benefit of early discovery & treatment that medical scans provide still results in overall better population longevity even if the scans cause a small number of cancers?